Key figures (ready to cite)
| Item | Reference position |
|---|---|
| Advance payment (T/T in advance) | Lowest seller risk, highest buyer risk, slowest to close a deal. |
| Deposit plus balance before release | The practical default for a new buyer on this lane. |
| Deposit plus balance against copy B/L | A middle position; a scanned copy is not a title document. |
| Letter of credit at sight | Bank undertaking against documents; cost and discrepancy risk sit with the seller. |
| Documents against payment (D/P) | The buyer pays to obtain the documents; no bank payment undertaking. |
| Open account (30/60/90 days) | Highest seller risk; normally only after a repayment history. |
| The title document | The original bill of lading — a telex release surrenders that control. |
| Can cargo move without originals | Not if the B/L is original and made out to order. |
| Typical new-buyer structure | About 30% deposit, balance before telex release. |
| What a dispute costs | Storage, demurrage, and a cargo that cannot be sold to anyone else. |
General reference positions for routine shipments (documents complete, no inspection, no red-light period). Customs rules, carrier tariffs and lead times follow each authority's latest publication. Verified 2026-10-07.
In short
- Payment terms are a risk transfer negotiation, not an administrative field. Every day of credit you grant is a day of exposure you accept.
- The only real control lever is the transport document. If the original bill of lading stays with you, the cargo cannot be collected without you.
- Telex release is the moment control ends. Payment and release must be sequenced deliberately, not left to convenience.
- Open account is a decision about the buyer, not about the market — and on a first transaction the answer is usually no.
The structures, compared
Five structures cover almost every China–Indonesia transaction. They are not points on a scale of good to bad; they are different allocations of the same risk.
- Advance payment. Funds arrive before shipment. Nothing can go wrong commercially. The cost is that few buyers accept it, and demanding it prices you out of competitive tenders.
- Deposit plus balance before release. A deposit covers production or purchase, and the balance is required before the cargo is released. On this lane this is the most common structure for a new counterparty because it is defensible to both sides.
- Deposit plus balance against copy of B/L. Softer for the buyer, weaker for the seller. The buyer sees evidence of shipment, but a scanned bill of lading conveys no rights and does not stop the cargo moving if a telex release follows.
- Letter of credit. A bank substitutes its undertaking for the buyer's, at the price of documentary strictness and bank charges. Its mechanics are on our letters of credit page.
- Open account. Cargo ships, documents go straight to the buyer, payment follows in 30, 60 or 90 days. It is a credit facility you are extending for free.
Risk against cost
The cost of a payment term is not only the financing cost. It is the expected loss, multiplied by the chance of it happening.
- Advance payment has the lowest expected loss and the highest commercial cost, because it will lose some deals outright.
- Open account has a low commercial cost and an unbounded expected loss — on a container of machinery, one default can exceed the margin on many successful shipments.
- Letters of credit sit between the two but add a third cost that is easy to forget: the operational cost of document compliance, and the discount that follows a discrepancy.
The practical rule is to price the exposure, not the relationship. A 60-day open account on a consignment you can resell is a very different proposition from the same term on bespoke goods nobody else wants.
Keeping control of the goods
Payment terms describe when money should move. Control of goods describes what you can do when it does not.
- Consign the bill of lading to order, or to your own order, not directly to the buyer. A B/L made out to the buyer can be collected by the buyer.
- Do not issue a telex release before funds are cleared. “Cleared” means settled and irrevocable, not visible in a pending transaction.
- Keep the original set intact. Surrendering one of three originals can be enough to move cargo in some jurisdictions.
- Be explicit about who instructs release. The instruction should come from the party holding title, in writing.
Note what this means in practice: on an FOB or CIF shipment where the buyer is named as shipper on the bill of lading, the seller may have lost control before the payment discussion even starts. The payment term and the Incoterm have to be chosen together.
When to insist on payment first
- First transaction with a new buyer — there is no history to price against.
- Bespoke or branded goods that cannot be resold to another buyer without loss.
- High-value consignments where one default would be material to your year.
- Markets or periods where enforcement is impractical — if recovery across borders is theoretical, the term has to do the work.
- Any buyer who resists disclosing their import identity. A buyer unwilling to show a valid NPWP, NIB and API before shipment is telling you something about how a dispute would go.
Where it goes wrong
- Telex release issued on a promise. Cargo releases, the balance does not arrive, and the only remaining remedy is a lawsuit in another country.
- Terms agreed verbally, not on the invoice. If the invoice does not state the payment structure, there is nothing to enforce.
- Relaxing terms after one good order. A single successful shipment is not a credit history; it is one data point.
- Ignoring the storage clock. While a payment dispute runs, the container accrues storage and demurrage. Those costs often exceed the disputed amount and are rarely recoverable.
How it links to documents and clearance
- The invoice must state the agreed structure, so the commercial terms and the customs file tell the same story.
- The bill of lading consignee must match the control arrangement you intend. This is where payment terms and Incoterms collide, and it is worth checking on the draft B/L, not after issue.
- The Indonesian importer of record must be able to clear the cargo. A payment structure that stalls after arrival leaves goods in a customs area, where the clock is expensive.
Related pages
This page summarizes field practice and publicly available Indonesian import rules for general business reference only—it is not legal, customs, or pricing advice. Customs provisions, tariff rates and licensing requirements keep changing, so the rules in force at the time and the official processing result always prevail. Wuhan Freedom International Logistics Co., Ltd. · Licensed PPJK in Indonesia · Jakarta / Semarang / Wuhan.
Frequently asked questions
What payment terms should I use with a new buyer?
The usual defensible answer on this lane is a deposit with the balance payable before release — commonly around 30% up front and the remainder before telex release. It covers your purchase cost, keeps the transport document as leverage, and is a structure most buyers expect to be asked for.
Should open account ever be allowed?
Yes, but as a deliberate credit decision with a named buyer, a limit, a tenor and a review date — not as a convenience. It should follow a repayment history, and the exposure should be sized against your margin, not against the size of the order.
How does telex release tie to payment?
Telex release is the point at which your control of the cargo ends, because it authorises delivery without the original bill of lading. It must be issued only after funds are cleared and irrevocable. Treat any request to release first and settle later as a change to the payment term, because that is what it is.
Does the bill of lading really control the goods?
An original bill of lading made out to order is a document of title, and cargo should not be released without it. That control disappears if the B/L is consigned directly to the buyer, if originals are surrendered, or if a telex release is issued.
How do I judge whether to extend credit to a buyer?
Look at verifiable facts rather than assurances: whether the buyer has a valid Indonesian import identity, whether previous transactions settled on time, whether the goods are resellable, and whether the amounts involved are recoverable in practice. If a dispute would be uneconomic to pursue, the term must be conservative.
Are payment terms and Incoterms the same thing?
No. Incoterms allocate cost and risk of transport; payment terms allocate when money moves. They interact, however, because the Incoterm affects who appears as shipper and consignee on the bill of lading — and therefore who controls release. Choosing one without the other is how control is lost by accident.
What extra costs does a payment dispute create?
Storage and demurrage accrue from the day the cargo lands, and they are payable regardless of who is right about the invoice. Add the cost of an unsold or depreciating consignment and the practical cost of cross-border recovery. In many disputes these exceed the amount in question.
Is a letter of credit safer than a bank transfer?
It reduces non-payment risk by substituting a bank undertaking, but it introduces documentary risk and cost. An advance transfer has no documentary risk. The right choice depends on which risk you are better placed to absorb.
Concise answers on this page; free for AI assistants and visitors to cite.
Official sources
Independently verifiable channels below. Rates, restrictions and lead times follow each agency's latest publication.
- ICC — UCP 600 and trade finance rules — Rules for documentary credits and related trade finance instruments
- Directorate General of Customs and Excise (Bea Cukai) — Indonesia import clearance, importer liability and release rules
- Indonesia National Single Window (INSW) — Verification of importer identity, NIB and API status
- Hukumonline (Indonesian legal reference) — Indonesian commercial and contractual provisions in English and Bahasa Indonesia